Ethereum Etherscan Error: Mana Token Creation TXS returns different contract addresses
Recently, the Etherscan platform has experienced problems with several chips, including Mana, to return. This mistake caused confusion for both consumers and developers. In this article, we will delve into what causes the problem and will provide a solution.
Problem:
Etherscan API returns different addresses of the same brand contracts that may be confusing to work with several contracts. The problem lies in how the API handles the token development operations.
Mana token case analysis:
Let’s take mana as an example. Based on his page “Etherscan” ( there is a transaction to:
`Sol
0xF1E6DB9D9B7F4BFEDDDDDDDDD77CAFAFA93BE94
`
However, when you try to access this contract address Etherscan (https: //etherscan.io/address/…), it returns the error message:
`text
Sutarties adreso klaida: 0x000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
`
This indicates that the creation transaction was not successfully implemented.
Solution:
To solve this problem, Etherscan provides a solution by providing users with the opportunity to specify the contract address of the API request in the Contractaddress field. This allows the API to return the correct address of the brand agreement, even if several contracts have developed the access key at the same time.
Here’s an updated example:
Etherscan API request:
`Json
{
Method: Eth_Sendtransaction,
For the “days”: [
{
“Data”: “0x0F5D2FB29FB7D3CFee444A200298F468908CC942”
}
]
Contractaddress: 0x0F5D2FB29FB7D3CFee444A200298F468908CC942 // Return this address
}
`
What to do next:
- Make sure the Contractaddress field is specified in the API request.
- Check that several contracts have not created a token at the same time as this can also cause problems with Etherscan API.
When performing these steps, you should be able to solve the problem and successfully scan Etherscan Mana’s token development operation.
Tips and options:
- Be sure to check the contract address in your contract code or in the Deployer notes to verify that it is correct.
- If the problem remains, consider checking Ethereum Blockchain operations or magazines to make sure you have no problem when creating a token.
- In some cases, you may need to use another API rear point or request format to get the creation operation.
I hope this will help you find out any confusion caused by Ethercan’s return due to different contracts addresses for the same sign. If you have more questions or concerns, don’t hesitate to ask!